A legal scholar argues that the judiciary’s “passive-aggressive approach” to the Trump Administration is doomed to fail.

Ironically, had the Trump administration chosen from the beginning to allow some semblance of due process, it would not now ...

NC could change the rules after the election is over, and throw out enough ballots to change the outcome. There are several ...

On Monday night, only Barrett joined the three liberal justices in dissenting from the Supreme Court’s decision to vacate an ...

Federal court judges have halted some of Trump's most questionable executive orders. The Supreme Court seems to be evenly ...

If the Supreme Court sides with South Carolina, many GOP-led states are expected to likewise block Planned Parenthood from ...

A key legal sticking point is whether the Medicaid statute contains the “magic ... from Alliance Defending Freedom outside of ...

If South Carolina succeeds, there will be almost no check on states that discriminate against healthcare providers for any ...

The Trump administration argued the law gives presidents "near-blanket authority" to detain and deport any noncitizen from a ...

Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh): Supreme Court (SC) judge Justice Pankaj Mittal suggested if three books - Gita, Vedas and Puranas- in addition to Constitution are kept in hand of Lady justice statue, ...

The Supreme Court on Monday debated how to define religion as it considered a case on a faith-based tax break. The justices generally seemed to think the government officials involved had adopted the ...

Supporters of Planned Parenthood argue the state violated the Medicare and Medicaid Act of 1965, which states beneficiaries ...